Sometimes people have said that I tackle things that other people won’t tackle and so on and so forth, and it has nothing to do with that. It simply has to do with me asking the question: “What’s the best thing and what’s the worst thing that happens if I do something, what’s the best thing and what’s the worst thing that happens if I do nothing?” On the basis of those four questions, I can determine whether I should do something or not. If the best thing that’s going to happen if I do nothing is that they’re going to die, then I certainly don’t have anything to lose by doing something. And, you can go through the combinations and you can see that they really would tend to lead you in the right direction. So, it’s not a matter of being radical or daring. It’s a matter of being logical, I think.